In Part I of the series, Jasmine Bingham sets the stage for a transformative energy revolution by criticizing the failures of sustainable green energy (SGE) policies. These initiatives, despite trillions of dollars in investments, have resulted in soaring utility costs, diminished energy capacity, and unfulfilled promises of abundance. The blog underscores the urgency of deregulation to unleash innovation, enabling the United States to reclaim its position as a global leader in energy. Drawing parallels to Edison’s transformative work, it argues for embracing technologies like modular nuclear reactors and hydrogen fuel cells while addressing environmental concerns through robust accountability measures.
Bingham highlights the geopolitical stakes, comparing U.S. regulatory stagnation with China’s aggressive clean energy advancements. The analysis reveals a critical gap between potential technological innovations and outdated policies that stifle progress. She urges policymakers to modernize permitting processes, streamline investments, and disclose transformative patents withheld from public access. With deregulation and innovation, America could achieve not just energy independence but an era of unprecedented economic growth and sustainability. Ultimately, the blog challenges readers to envision a future of infinite energy abundance—a future where the American entrepreneurial spirit reignites the world’s imagination.
The United States stands at a pivotal crossroads: Amid escalating concerns over energy security and the urgent need for economic resilience, global energy markets are in constant upheaval, driven by shifting geopolitical alliances and volatile supply chains. The tug-of-war between soaring utility rates in the face of heightened institutional and consumer demand has become a battle that cannot be won for it is stymied by its own inertia:
For investors, the current regulatory environment discourages risk-taking in clean technologies, driving capital toward international markets with clearer policies. Businesses face rising energy costs and regulatory hurdles that erode global competitiveness. For governments, balancing environmental goals with economic realities is crucial to addressing energy insecurity. Finally, the public bears the brunt of outdated systems, with rising utility bills straining household budgets and limiting economic mobility.
America is meandering down an avenue riddled with brown-outs, outages, weather disruptions, continued dependence on foreign oil, and buyer’s remorse of the billions allocated toward Green Energy— which has not delivered its promise of abundance and lower cost. If technology companies like Amazon, Google, and Meta are clamoring for dedicated nuclear reactors to fuel their internal race for artificial intelligence (despite decades of Green Energy installations), perhaps it is time for America to have an honest conversation about what a real Energy Revolution looks like.
It is the Financial Policy Council’s (FPC) commitment to foster free-market solutions that will enable America to become a leader in the next Energy Revolution. This is crucial for regaining our position as a world leader. By identifying the challenges and failures of current energy initiatives, we may spark a spirited race along paths already paved by brilliant scientists over the past century. To do otherwise is illogical, at best; national suicide, at worst. To learn more about FPC’s stance on Energy, read our white paper, “Energy: Policy Recommendations, Projections and Opportunities.” Topics include: geopolitical factors shaping energy markets; consumption trends, oil and gas; renewable energy; investment opportunities; and policy recommendations.
History proves the universal pivot toward billions of taxpayer dollars steered toward Sustainable Green Energy (SGE) initiatives was, in fact, a gross misallocation of taxpayer funds. In this blog, we will shed light on those costs and their negative outcomes, which include soaring energy costs and diminished energy capacity, especially during peak need and horrific weather.
If the status quo does not change immediately, how will America meet the surging demand for increased manufacturing capacity, artificial intelligence, Bitcoin mining, satellite installations, and space exploration? By shackling all of the above, how will the United States ever pay down its current, record-breaking national debt of $36 trillion? Imagine being on the hook for $1 trillion in interest payments—annually! The choices we make today—whether to embrace innovation and deregulation, or continue sideways with outdated policies and scientific misconceptions—will determine America’s trajectory at a time when the world is crumbling around us. Our leadership matters. Let us get back to being innovators by unlocking the science in the vaults!
Balancing Innovation and Accountability
Deregulation holds immense promise for accelerating energy innovation and reducing costs, but it is not without challenges. Critics argue that loosening regulations could lead to environmental risks, such as insufficient oversight of emissions or waste management, potentially undoing progress in combating climate change. Additionally, public skepticism persists regarding the safety and feasibility of certain technologies like modular nuclear reactors. Concerns about nuclear waste disposal, the risk of accidents, and high initial costs often dominate discussions.
To address these issues, it is essential to pair deregulation with robust accountability measures. For example, establishing industry-wide safety standards for modular nuclear reactors and incentivizing investments in advanced waste management solutions can mitigate risks. Public education campaigns can also play a pivotal role in building trust by transparently communicating the benefits and safeguards of emerging energy technologies.
By acknowledging these concerns and proactively addressing them, we can foster a more inclusive and informed dialogue, ensuring that the energy revolution benefits all stakeholders without compromising environmental or public safety.
How may we balance accountability amidst innovation and, ultimately, public discourse ahead of industry implementation? Just as Edison’s electric bulb faced skepticism before revolutionizing society, today’s energy solutions (modular nuclear reactors, hydrogen fuel cells–and even speculative technologies such as Plasma Energy, discussed in Part II of this blog) hold similar potential to redefining the way we power our world. The lesson is clear: Progress often emerges from the crucible of doubt, driven by visionaries willing to challenge the status quo.
The dawn of an Energy Revolution is upon us. Infinite abundance will reshape the future of humanity. Will America once again shine on the world stage as its leader in The Next Energy Revolution?
Educating stakeholders—ranging from policymakers to the general public—is critical to driving the energy revolution. Programs such as public awareness campaigns, investor workshops, and industry conferences can bridge knowledge gaps and foster collaboration. For example, highlighting the economic benefits of clean energy investments can build support among skeptical communities, ensuring a united effort toward energy transformation. Achieving this vision requires not only technological innovation but also widespread understanding and collaboration among all stakeholders.
PART I of this blog delves into the transformative potential of groundbreaking energy technologies and their capacity to revolutionize how America powers its future. [PART II gives the scientific history of Plasma Energy, along with recent evidence of said technologies viewed across the world, proving what was deemed Classified was implemented for military use, and we share anecdotal evidence.] At a time when the global energy landscape is undergoing seismic shifts, the need for innovative, market-driven solutions has never been more critical. We believe the tools for a sustainable, economically vibrant future are already within our grasp.
By examining current trends and innovations, this blog uncovers actionable insights that illuminate America’s pathway toward explosive economic growth and true environmental sustainability. This is not merely a call for technological advancement, for the advancement is already here. This is an urgent request for policy makers to fully disclose the numerous transformative patents currently withheld from public knowledge. Safe-guarding low-cost energy innovations crushes America’s entrepreneurial spirit—a spirit that has long served as a beacon of progress on the world stage.
The U.S. can adopt a two-pronged approach to energy reform:
Despite the rapid advancement of energy technologies, the United States faces a critical barrier: outdated regulatory frameworks stifle innovation and delay progress. These bottlenecks undermine economic growth, jeopardize energy security, and risk ceding global leadership to nations like China, which has aggressively invested in clean energy technologies. Without decisive action, the U.S. remains vulnerable in an increasingly competitive global energy landscape.
IMPORTANTLY, while the theoretical foundations of Zero Point Energy, in particular, ignite our imagination (and, hopefully, yours) its practical applications remain elusive (particularly due to zero conversations regarding its existence). Managing expectations around such technologies ensures that enthusiasm is tempered with realism, fostering an informed discourse (i.e., Disclose Responsibly, but at least acknowledge it…)
Let us begin by comparing the allocation of funds, both by the United States and by China, and compare that investment to the human outcome: have energy costs come down for consumers? If energy was sustainable, plentiful, available to all, one would assume the efficiency of such a model would dictate lower energy cost over time. We asked Grok for data. The United States has allocated likely trillions of dollars to implement Green Energy–here’s a summary of what Grok has to say:
In summary, while precise figures are hard to come by due to the complexity and evolution of funding mechanisms, it’s clear that the U.S. has invested hundreds of billions, likely approaching or even exceeding a trillion dollars, in sustainable green energy through direct funding and tax incentives over the first quarter of this century. This estimate would include both direct government spending and the fiscal impact of tax credits.
…only to cause utility bills across the country to spike beyond levels never before seen–here is an excerpt of what Grok has to say.
Overall Utility Costs:
Here is what Grok has to say about China’s investment in Green Energy:
In 2022 alone, China spent $546 billion on investments that included solar and wind energy, electric vehicles, and batteries, accounting for nearly half of the world’s low-carbon spending for that year.
Over the period from 2017 to 2022, China invested approximately $681 billion in renewable energy.
Globally, in 2023, clean energy investments hit a record $1.8 trillion, with China being the biggest market, which suggests a continued trend of significant investment.
These figures indicate that China’s spending on green energy has been substantial, positioning it as a leader in renewable energy investments worldwide. However, exact totals for the entire century are not explicitly detailed in these sources, but the trend of aggressive investment in green energy is clear.
…but, again, the benefits to Chinese consumers are not as robust as one would expect. Here is what Grok has to say about China’s utility costs, over time:
In summary, utility costs for Chinese consumers have risen significantly from 2000 to today, driven by economic development, policy changes towards cost-reflective pricing, and environmental considerations. Despite these increases, China’s utility prices remain competitive on a global scale, though the impact on local consumers has been notable due to the rapid rise from a previously low base.
Even across the pond in Europe, billions have been spent on Green Energy yet they find themselves struggling to stay warm as we speak due to war tensions and the absence of sufficient gas and coal as an alternative. Here is a summary of what Grok has to say about the European Union’s investment in Green Energy, this century:
…the spending on green energy by the European Union has been in the hundreds of billions of dollars, with recent years showing particularly high investment due to strategic shifts in energy policy and the urgency of climate goals.
However, the economic impact on European consumers varies depending on “geopolitical and economic factors,” as Grok reveals when answering our question:
In conclusion, while energy prices for European consumers have generally increased over this century, the trajectory has been marked by significant spikes, particularly in the last few years due to geopolitical and economic factors. The push towards green energy has also played a role in shaping energy costs, with long-term benefits aimed at sustainability but short-term costs for consumers.
Based on the above, it is questionable if a nation’s quality of life improved, commensurate with the capital and assets pushed toward SGE cottage industries. The world was titillated by the glossy promises and plastic presentations, wrapped in feel-good, recycled green hyperbole. However, what such schemes fail to counteract is TIME: Over time they fail because over time their inadequacies reveal themselves in glorious ways. Some examples include electric vehicle chargers being powered by “fossil fuel” generators; and wind turbines that cannot operate during freezing weather or survive deadly tornados. Over time, green countries may resemble South Australia (their summer now) with astronomical power prices due to the failure of sustainable wind turbine energy capacity. How many people suffer the consequences of the misallocation of their hard-earned tax dollars? Too many over time, and that is a fact.
NOW imagine a world in which energy was no longer defined by scarcity, but by abundance? What if drilling, mining, and blanketing agricultural land with solar panels and wind farms became unnecessary? Imagine a world where next-generation Zero Point Energy, Hydrogen Fuel Cells, and Modular Nuclear Reactors revolutionize the way we produce and consume energy.
Imagine a paradigm shift, within reach, that could slash the cost of energy creation, create capacity on demand; and conversely lower energy costs. Opportunities once thought impossible will be realized. Advancements will not only meet growing energy demands but exceed them, sustainably and efficiently. Imagine how many industries may be transformed from the ground up, let alone how many new industries may be created, employing so many workers. The time to imagine such things is NOW.
What is Zero Point Energy (ZPE)? We asked Grok and here is the summary answer:
In summary, zero-point energy is a fascinating concept rooted in quantum mechanics, representing the residual energy that persists even at absolute zero. While it has theoretical implications and observable effects like the Casimir force, the practical harnessing of this energy for human use remains beyond current scientific technology and understanding.
But despite the implied hurdles of harnessing ZPE, as Grok expressed above, when asked what industries could benefit from it, Grok sounds excited by the possibilities. Here’s a summary version:
Zero-point energy (ZPE), if harnessed effectively, could theoretically offer a limitless and clean energy source, impacting various industries in profound ways. Here’s an exploration based on the theoretical potential of ZPE:
Electric Power Generation: … nearly infinite source of energy without the environmental impact of traditional fossil fuels….phasing out of coal, oil, and gas power plants, significantly reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Transportation: Vehicles powered by ZPE could eliminate the need for gasoline or electric batteries…with potentially infinite range and no emissions.
Aerospace: Propulsion systems…could enable longer and more efficient space travel, possibly making interplanetary travel more feasible and less costly.
Manufacturing: Industries like steel, cement, and chemicals…could benefit from reduced energy costs and a stable, clean energy supply, potentially lowering production costs and environmental impact.
Quantum Computing: stable, high-energy environment provided by ZPE might help in maintaining the delicate conditions needed for quantum bits (qubits), enhancing the capabilities of quantum computing.
Advanced Electronics: …could power devices…beyond current battery limitations, leading to thinner, lighter, and more powerful electronics.
Healthcare: Energy-efficient, long-lasting power sources for medical devices, especially those implanted in the body, could extend device life and improve patient outcomes.
Environmental: Water Desalination…could become more cost-effective, helping to solve water scarcity issues in arid regions.
Waste Management: Advanced waste-to-energy processes…reducing landfill use.
Defense and Security: …the concept of energy weapons or long-lasting power for remote or underwater military installations…
Space Exploration: …provide power for self-sustaining habitats on other planets or moons, supporting extended missions and possibly colonization efforts.
Research and Development: …clean, inexhaustible energy…potentially leading to new discoveries in physics, chemistry, and biology.
Consumer Products: …Household devices could operate without the need for external power, reducing dependency on the grid and potentially lowering utility bills.
As we can see, the potential benefits to mankind from tapping Zero Point Energy are infinite. Why is ZPE not pursued as aggressively as sustainable green energy (SGE)? Here is the last part of Grok’s answer, addressing the challenges and considerations:
Challenges and Considerations:
Feasibility: Currently, the practical extraction of ZPE remains theoretical and is not supported by mainstream scientific consensus as a viable energy source due to the lack of a mechanism to extract this energy.
Economic Impact: The introduction of ZPE would likely disrupt existing energy markets, industries, and economies, necessitating careful management of the transition.
The disruption of ZPE to existing markets would likely be severe; therefore, the transition must be controlled carefully. ZPE may also never fall into the wrong hands. One can only imagine the lethality of black holes on demand. Which leads us to question who holds the secrets of the Golden Goose that is Free Energy? We asked Grok: How much money (i.e., taxpayer dollars) have been spent (through direct funding and/or tax credits) on gravitic propulsion systems and or zero point energy systems and or magnetic propulsion systems in the USA? Here is a summary of what Grok has to say:
“The exact amount of taxpayer dollars spent on gravitic propulsion systems, zero-point energy systems, and magnetic propulsion systems in the USA is not publicly itemized or comprehensively documented due to the highly speculative and often classified nature of such research. “ [emphasis our own]
We asked Grok, “does the United States impose greater regulatory burdens on the energy sector versus other countries?” Here is a summary of what Grok says:
While the U.S. imposes significant regulatory burdens, especially in environmental protection, the nature and extent of these regulations can vary widely compared to other countries. Some countries might have simpler or less stringent regulatory frameworks, particularly in terms of market entry and operational flexibility, but are increasingly adopting more rigorous environmental standards. The U.S. regulatory environment is often seen as more complex due to its federal-state interplay, but this complexity can also lead to innovation and high standards in environmental protection.
Here, we highlight the challenges different categories of stakeholder currently face:
For Investors, the regulatory bottlenecks embedded in U.S. energy policy create significant barriers to private investment in clean technologies, shifting capital toward markets with clearer, more predictable pathways to innovation. The financial implications of this trend are profound.
According to recent data it is suggested that green energy companies in China generated 15% higher returns compared to their U.S. counterparts in 2023, demonstrating the economic potential unlocked by streamlined policies and proactive government support.
For U.S. investors, this disparity represents both a challenge and an opportunity: while navigating domestic policy hurdles is daunting, those who successfully identify opportunities in clean technologies positioned for breakthroughs could achieve significant long-term gains.
For Businesses, the consequences of these regulatory delays are equally severe. Rising energy costs, coupled with bureaucratic obstacles to adopting advanced technologies like modular nuclear reactors, are inflating operational expenses and eroding the global competitiveness of American manufacturers. These inefficiencies leave businesses struggling to maintain profitability while their international competitors—particularly in Asia and Europe—capitalize on faster approvals and lower production costs driven by advanced energy solutions. Without immediate reform, U.S. companies risk losing market share and diminishing their influence in critical industries tied to energy innovation.
For Governments, the need to balance environmental oversight with streamlined permitting processes is urgent. Federal agencies face mounting pressure to address energy insecurity and economic instability, both of which are exacerbated by outdated policies that hinder innovation. Failure to modernize these frameworks risks perpetuating inefficiencies, discouraging private-sector collaboration, and leaving the U.S. ill-prepared to confront global energy challenges. By adopting a forward-thinking approach that aligns environmental goals with economic realities, policymakers can create a regulatory environment that fosters growth, enhances national security, and ensures sustainable energy leadership.
For the Public, delays in energy innovation have a tangible impact on households. Inefficiencies in the energy grid, coupled with rising fuel costs and other factors, contribute to increasing utility bills, straining family budgets, and exacerbating economic disparities. Investing in grid modernization and accelerating the transition to clean energy sources is crucial to ensuring affordable and reliable energy for all Americans. These rising costs disproportionately affect lower-income communities, compounding financial pressures on already vulnerable populations. Addressing these delays through grid modernization and the adoption of advanced energy technologies is critical to alleviating this burden, fostering economic equity, and ensuring affordable energy access for all Americans.
On the flip side, while deregulation holds the promise of unlocking significant economic opportunities, it remains a contentious issue. Critics caution that loosening environmental safeguards could lead to unintended consequences, including increased emissions, environmental degradation, and erosion of public trust in both institutions and industry. These concerns underscore the potential risks of prioritizing economic growth over sustainability. However, proponents argue that targeted deregulation, implemented alongside robust private-sector accountability, offers a viable path forward; and we agree.
By focusing on streamlining overly burdensome regulations rather than removing necessary protections, they contend that the U.S. can foster both innovation and environmental stewardship. This approach emphasizes collaboration between policymakers, businesses, and environmental organizations to create frameworks that encourage technological advancements without compromising ecological integrity. Striking this delicate balance is critical to achieving progress that aligns economic aspirations with sustainability goals. It ensures that economic growth, innovation, and environmental responsibility work in harmony to secure a prosperous, sustainable future for all.
As part of its mission to drive economic growth, the Financial Policy Council actively supports policies and initiatives that remove barriers to innovation in the energy sector. Our advocacy for deregulation aligns with this blog’s call to modernize permitting process, unlock investment potential, and foster economic resilience for the United States of America. FPC members benefit from unparalleled access to resources and investment opportunities in emerging energy technologies, such as Hydrogen Fuel Cells and Modular Nuclear Reactors.
Through our white papers and industry seminars, the FPC equips policymakers and investors with the tools needed to drive transformative change in the energy sector.
And this leads to our conclusion: Our hope is the new Trump administration will fuel this new Energy Revolution.
The Trump-Vance platform includes “rebuilding our cities…making them safe, clean, and beautiful again; cancel the electric vehicle mandate and cut costly and burdensome regulations.” President Trump is an innovator and has openly embraced Bitcoin and Space Force. He understands America has the brilliant minds and manpower to achieve our leadership position once again in the world.
It is our hope the Trump administration opens a spirited debate on Free Energy initiatives. America and the world have been put through the ringer with broken promises. It is our turn to have full-faith discussion about how we, the citizens, want to move forward. This administration may listen to the clamor of bright minds searching for truth, backed by law and order, so the American Spirit may once again be the beacon of innovation. We believe Trump will deliver. The time is NOW.
Join the Financial Policy Council’s next webinar to learn how these technologies are shaping America’s energy future. FPC has spearheaded critical discussions on policy; our white papers and seminars drive actionable solutions for stakeholders. Learn from case studies like Greensburg, Kansas, which rebuilt its economy with 100% renewable energy.
This is your opportunity to be part of a movement that not only addresses America’s energy challenges but also sets the stage for global leadership in sustainability.
I encourage you to visit www.financialpolicycouncil.org for comprehensive insights and resources on renewable energy and clean technology innovation.
Let us take this step forward—together!
Disclaimer: This article discusses certain companies and their products or services as potential solutions. These mentions are for illustrative purposes only and should not be interpreted as endorsements or investment recommendations. All investment strategies carry inherent risks, and it is imperative that readers conduct their own independent research and seek advice from qualified investment professionals tailored to their specific financial circumstances before making any investment decisions.
The content provided here does not constitute personalized investment advice. Decisions to invest or engage with any securities or financial products mentioned in this article should only be made after consulting with a qualified financial advisor, considering your investment objectives and risk tolerance. The author assumes no responsibility for any financial losses or other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from the use of the content of this article.
As with any financial decision, thorough investigation and caution are advised before making investment decisions.
Introduction: A State Betrayed by Greed Florida, the sun-soaked paradise where retirees come to enjoy their golden years, where families build their futures, where millions...
Martin C. Johns MD The Dawn of the AI-Driven Property Wars: A Revolution Beyond the Realm of Human Comprehension The integration of artificial intelligence into real estate is not...
Karina Benzineb DECLASSIFY ZERO POINT ENERGY TECHNOLOGY TO THE WORLD Let us delve into the history of science, specifically the science behind innovative energy creation. While Alternative...
Jasmine Bingham We Extend Our Gratitude to Our Partners
3 replies on “THE NEXT ENERGY REVOLUTION IS HERE: PART I”
Well written Jasmine, some companies are rapidly progressing in the ZPE field to make these technologies a reality. Well done summarizing the impact. Reed@zpower.com
Excellent article filled with “truths”. I started in energy field in 1983 working at Basin Electric Power Company as an intern., etc then as contractor at DoE. Happy you opened up this blog., etc now support DLA Energy Am all for everything in this article.
Our future depends more and more upon robust and diverse energy sources with resilient distribution. That means it, our future, is dependent on streamlined regulation, removal of carbon penalties and taxes, renewed investment in infrastructure and piplelines and redoubled research and development in alterative energy sources like fusion (plasma) and also in technologies to clean existing carbon energy sources.